Review



primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium  (Procell Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Procell Inc primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium
    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and <t>epithelial</t> loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Primary Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cell Complete Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/primary+human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cell+complete+medium/pmc12877318-283-8-20?v=Procell+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway"

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    Journal: MedComm

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.

    Techniques Used: In Vivo, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Targeted Gene Expression, Control, Immunofluorescence, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Standard Deviation

    Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.

    Techniques Used: Knockdown, In Vivo, Injection, Recombinant, Staining, Virus

    Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.

    Techniques Used: Migration, In Vitro, Western Blot, Staining, Transfection, Negative Control, Control, Standard Deviation

    Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.

    Techniques Used: Inhibition, In Vitro, Mutagenesis, Binding Assay, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Autoradiography, Labeling, Sequencing, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Negative Control, Staining, Western Blot, Targeted Gene Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Standard Deviation, Proximity Ligation Assay



    Similar Products

    86
    Procell Inc primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium
    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and <t>epithelial</t> loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.
    Primary Human Gastric Mucosal Epithelial Cell Complete Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/primary+human+gastric+mucosal+epithelial+cell+complete+medium/pmc12877318-283-8-20?v=Procell+Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Dietary nitrate attenuates ethanol‐induced gastric mucosal hemorrhage and oedema in vivo. (A) Establishment of ethanol‐induced gastric ulcer in rats by intragastric administration of anhydrous ethanol. (B) Flowchart of the animal experimental procedures. (C) Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa in four groups. (D) Quantification of gastric damage expressed as the ulcer index (UI). The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E) Representative HE‐stained images of stomach tissues. Scale bar = 50 µm. (F) Histological evaluation of gastric lesions using a microscopic HE score (0–14). The score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). (G) Representative CD31 IF staining images in gastric mucosa. Scale bar = 20 µm. (H and I) RT‐qPCR analysis of Ang1 and Et1 mRNA expression in gastric mucosa. Target gene expression was normalized to Gapdh mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the control group. (J and K) The nitrate levels of the serum and gastric mucosa in the four groups. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; Nit, nitrate; IF, immunofluorescence; CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1; Ang1, angiotensin‐1; Et1, endothelin‐1; RT‐qPCR, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; SD, standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Targeted Gene Expression, Control, Immunofluorescence, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Standard Deviation

    Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tff2 knockdown abolishes nitrate protection against ethanol‐induced gastric ulcers in vivo. (A) Establishment of Tff2‐KD rat by tail vein injection of recombinant AAV. (B) The timeline of dietary nitrate administration (3 weeks after injection and 7 days before ethanol gavage). (C and D) The macroscopic appearance and ulcer index of the gastric mucosa in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups with ethanol gavage. The UI was calculated as follows: UI = 10 × (ulcerated area/total mucosal area). (E and F) Representative histology images of stomach tissue and a histopathologic score of HE staining in Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The HE score sums the severity of four features: inflammatory cells (0–3), mucosal edema (0–4), hemorrhage (0–4), and epithelial loss (0–3). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G and H) Representative gastric tissue images of AB–PAS staining and mucin histochemical analysis of Tff2‐KD and scramble groups. The mucin area was expressed as fold change relative to the scramble + EtOH group. Scale bar = 50 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. AAV, adeno‐associated virus; HE, hematoxylin–eosin; AB–PAS, Alcian blue and periodic acid‐Schiff; EtOH, ethanol; KD, knockdown; Nit, nitrate; Tff2; trefoil factor 2.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Knockdown, In Vivo, Injection, Recombinant, Staining, Virus

    Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Nitrate promotes migration by TFF2 upregulation in vitro. (A) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells in Ibidi culture inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h in (A). (D and E) Representative immunoblotting band of the TFF2 protein and analysis of band gray values. (F) IF staining of pMLC (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 40 µm. (G) IF analysis of pMLC with MFI. (H) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts. Scale bar = 500 µm. (I and J) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. (K) Images of the scratch healing process of GES‐1 cells transfected with si‐ TFF2 /si‐negative control in Ibidi culture‐inserts containing ethanol. Scale bar = 500 µm. (L and M) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate at 24 h and 48 h. Migration rate is quantified by the percentage of closed area to the initial scratch area. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and ns denotes no significance. TFF2, trefoil factor 2; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; EtOH, ethanol; Nit, nitrate; Ctrl, control; MLC, myosin light chain 2; pMLC, phosphorylated myosin light chain 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; NC, negative control; SD, standard deviation.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Migration, In Vitro, Western Blot, Staining, Transfection, Negative Control, Control, Standard Deviation

    Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.

    Journal: MedComm

    Article Title: Nitrate Enhances Gastric Mucosa Defense and Repair Process in Ethanol‐Induced Gastric Ulcer Rats via the Notch–Tff2 Pathway

    doi: 10.1002/mco2.70628

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Nitrate functions by Notch pathway inhibition positively transcripting TFF2 in vitro. (A) Diagram of the wild‐type and mutant sequences for the three predicted RBPJ binding sites within the 251 bp TFF2 promoter probes. (B) Representative electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) autoradiograph. Hot probe is the biotin‐labeled wild‐type oligonucleotides of the truncated TFF2 promoter containing the binding motif; Mutant probe is the labeled oligonucleotides sequence with nucleotides mutated. The cold probe is nonlabeled competitive wild‐type probes (100 and 50 that of the concentrations). The shifted bands are indicated by arrows, which suggested the formation of DNA–protein complexes (lane 2, 3, 7). The super shifted bands indicated the formation of DNA–protein–antibody complexes (lane 3, 7). “+” and “−” represent presence and absence, respectively. (C) Relative TFF2 promoter (Full, Mut1, Mut2, and Mut3) luciferase activity was detected by DLR assays in RBPJ overexpressed and normal‐expressed GES‐1 cells. (D) A schematic diagram showing the location of RBPJ putative binding regions on the TFF2 promoter. (E) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 binding site expression of GES‐1 cells. Target site expression in RBPJ‐treated groups was normalized to IgG negative control groups and expressed as fold change relative to the IgG groups. (F) IF staining of NICD (pink) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 µm. (G) IF analysis of MFI of nuclear NICD in positive cells. (H) Representative immunoblotting band of Notch signaling pathway in GES‐1 cells. (I–K) Analyses of immunoblotting band gray value of (H). (L) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression of DMSO/DAPT treated GES‐1 cells. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the DMSO vehicle group. (M) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD deprived GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector + DMSO group. (N) RT‐qPCR analysis of TFF2 mRNA expression in RBPJ overexpressed and NICD‐RBPJ overexpressed GES‐1 cells. The target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH mRNA and expressed as fold change relative to the vector1 + vector2 group. (O) Representative image of PLA of NICD–RBPJ proximity. Each red dot represents a positive signal of NICD–RBPJ interaction and nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 µm. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and ns denotes no significance. Nit, nitrate; EtOH, ethanol; GES‐1, human gastric epithelial; NICD, intracellular structural domain; RBPJ, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; TFF2, trefoil factor 2; DAPI, 2‐(4‐amidinophenyl)‐6‐indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride; Yhhu‐3792, N2‐(4‐isopropylphenyl)‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenoxy) quinazoline‐2,4‐diamine; Luc, luciferase; SD, standard deviation; DLR, dual‐luciferase report; PLA, proximity ligation assay.

    Article Snippet: Primary human gastric mucosal epithelial (CP‐H048) cells and primary human gastric mucosal epithelial cell complete medium (CM‐H048) were purchased from Procell (Wuhan, Hubei, China).

    Techniques: Inhibition, In Vitro, Mutagenesis, Binding Assay, Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, Autoradiography, Labeling, Sequencing, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Negative Control, Staining, Western Blot, Targeted Gene Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Standard Deviation, Proximity Ligation Assay